spacer
spacer search
History of England  
Search
spacer
 
We have 24 guests online
Home
Site Map
About This Site
General History
Kings and Queens
British Empire
London History
World War II
Religion
Sex and Marriage

Reference Books
Links
Contact Us
Search Site

Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one

Since January 2006
Visitors: 434123
 
Home arrow Religion arrow The Inquisition

The Inquisition PDF Print E-mail
THE INQUISITION
THE SPANISH INQUISITION
ENEMIES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH
THE ENFORCING ARM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

INTRODUCTION
The word Inquisition is normally associated with something terrible which happened in Spain in the late Middle Ages (c.1500) under the authority of King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella. Indeed this is correct and describes the Spanish Inquisition but the origins of the Inquisition go back much further to around 1200 when the Pope in Rome (Innocent 3rd) set up an organisation to get rid of a reformist Christian movement, the Cathars of southern France. Since that time the Inquisition has been the office in the Vatican which has enforced the dogma of the church on its faithful or unfaithful flock. In the Middle Ages and even up to the time of Napoleon, that is only 200 years ago, this took the form of torture and murder, the latter by burning alive (Burning at the stake). Latterly, that is in more civilised times the punishment for transgression is excommunication (removal from the Catholic Church) which for some devout Catholics would be a fate worse than death. The Inquisition office is also responsible for censorship which mainly takes the form of producing a huge and ever growing list of forbidden books.

Although the Cathars reached England before they were exterminated, the Inquisition did not, even though John Wycliffe gave them enough reason to. The Inquisition supported the Catholic anti Reformation movement but they were too busy in Germany to bother about England. The Inquisition has been likened to a combination of Hitler’s Gestapo and SS. The fact that the present head (year 2000) is a German called Cardinal Ratzinger is presumably a non sequitor.

THE INQUISITION
1000 YEARS AGO

This story starts at the time when the Catholic Church although well established and already wealthy, was going through a period of threatening actions from powerful reformers and different ideologies.
  • 1054 The Christian Church splits in two. The church in Constantinople splits from the Church in Rome significantly cutting the huge income coming to the wealthy Pope.
  • 1095 The Crusades. With the Muslims threatening the territories under the rule of the Eastern Roman Empire head quartered in Constantinople, which included the holy city of Jerusalem. The Roman ruler of Byzantium, supported by the Patriarch of the newly formed Christian Orthodox church sent a messenger to the Pope in Rome asking for military reinforcements. The Pope surprisingly (bearing in mind he had just been snubbed by Constantinople) responded with the Crusades. Recruiting Crusaders was not too difficult because the rewards for taking part were attractive to out of work Knights, prisoners and labourers who were immediately pardoned for all their past and future sins, their financial debts and could keep any bounty stolen en-route. Many a Crusader was set up for life with riches, land, slaves and often a harem of wives. Indeed at the recruiting centre, which was the town of Clermont in Southern France, Crusaders were being offered a quick route to heaven in return for killing a few Muslims. (Clearly frighteningly similar to rewards for Muslims of today who take part in a Jihad.) (Crusaders took the opportunity to hone their fighting skills on any group they came across en-route who were not Christians. Many settlements of unsuspecting Jews were decimated during these times particularly in Germany.) The next three Crusades were in 1147, 1189 and 1202.
  • 1206: The next threat to the wealth and domination of the Catholic Church came not from the Muslims in the Middle East but from a fundamentalist religious movement, the Cathars of France. Indeed the origins of this creed came from the Bogomils in Bulgaria which is nearby Constantinople via the Black Sea and would have been ruled by the Byzantines and come under the teachings of the Christian Orthodox Church at this time. Cathars and Bogomils believed in the fundamental teachings of early Christians without believing that Jesus was the Messiah or the son of God.
The Cathars came to France at a time when the Catholic Church was at a morally low ebb. In some places Mass had not been taken for 30 years. Priests lived like Nobles many having a harem of mistresses. The Pope himself described his own priests as “worse than beasts wallowing in their own dung”. On the other hand Cathars did not “bully, extort, traffic in guilt, emotionally blackmail, tyrannise or terrorise with threats of eternal damnation or demand payment or bribes at every opportunity”. Catholics fled to the Cathars in droves which had an immediate and serious effect on the churches income.
  • 1208-1218. Pope Innocent 3rd wrote to the king of France, stating that the Cathars were worse than the Muslim Infidel and that he should organise a crusade against the Cathars. All those taking part would receive the same benefits as Crusaders to the Middle East Holy Land so long as they signed up for 40 days. A military commander emerged called Baron Simon de Montfort supported by the fanatical Papal Legate, Arnald Amaury, Abbot of Citeaux. With a Crusade of some 15,000 men it took about 10 years to exterminate some 15,000 men women and children from the Cathars (and Jews who got caught up in the massacre.) During this period the Spanish King of Aragon came in on the side of the Cathars but was defeated and when Simon de Montfort was killed at Toulouse the King of France himself took on the role of Crusade commander. At the end those Cathars who survived disappeared into Lombardy, present day northern Italy and Catalonia, Barcelona, north east Spain.
NOTES
  1. The territory influenced by the Cathars covered much of present day Southern France. Part of this land was being ruled by the Norman Kings of England and a part further east, away from the coast, by another King, Louis 9th of a much smaller France.
  2. The Baron leading this Crusade, as mentioned above was Simon de Montfort. He was also at the same time the senior Baron in England reporting to English Henry 3rd.
  3. Henry 3rd lost much of his “French” land back to Louis at this time. Remember: Henry 2nd 1154-89 ruled in England, Wales, the east coast of Ireland including Dublin and the whole of the west part of present day France, that is from Normandy south to the Spanish boarders on the west side of Paris and Orleans. King Richard 1189-99 spent too much time crusading in the Middle East to look after this huge territory. King John 1199-1216 lost more land through bad relationships with the Barons in France. He was forced into signing the Magna Carta by the Barons in England. Henry 3rd 1216-72 was certainly not the character to get back any of these lands in France where many of the French barons preferred the French King Louis 9th. Around the time Simon de Montfort led the Crusade against the Cathars in southern France he also led the English Barons (many were also Norman French) in a small civil war against King Henry 3rd to persuade him to adopt the principles of government laid out in the Magna Carta. Henry was actually imprisoned for a short time.
  4. The Cathars movement did indeed come to England. This was not known until about 40 years ago when a man redecorating his 1000 year old house in Piccotts End in the Hertfordshire Chilterns (35 miles north of London) came across a perfectly preserved wall painting of Cathar origin. It is presumed they used this house HQ while visiting the friendly English Monks in their Monastery in Ashridge Forest. (Burnt down by Henry 8th 300 years later)


<Previous
spacer
 

Mambo is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.
spacer